References
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy, and other essays: Monthly Review Press.
Anderson, L. M., & Bird, T. (1995). How three prospective teachers construed three cases of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 479-499.
Asmar, C. (2002). Strategies to enhance learning and teaching in a research-extensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 18-30.
Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51).
Becker, H. J., & Ravitz, J. (1999). The influence of computer and Internet use on teachers' pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356-384.
Bellas, M. L. (1997). Disciplinary differences in faculty salaries: Does gender bias play a role? Journal of Higher Education, 68(3), 299-321.
Benjamin, E. (1999). Disparities in the salaries and appointments of academic women and men. ACADEME, 85(1), 60-62.
Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Fifth ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Betts, K. (1999). Perception vs. reality: top 10 motivators and inhibitors for participating in distance education as view by faculty and deans at a research II institution. Retrieved December 15, 2002, from http://www.geteducated.com/vug/archives/vug0499.htm#chalk
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America : educational reform and the contradictions of economic life (Paperback ed.). New York: Basic Books.
Brown, A. H., Cervero, R. M., & Johnson-Bailey, J. (2000). Making the invisible visible: Race, gender, and teaching in adult education. Adult Education Quarterly, 50(4), 273.
Butler, D. (2000). Gender, girls, and computer technology: What's the status now? Clearing House, 73(4), 225.
Butler, D., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educause Quartely, 25(2), 22-28.
Butler, J. (1993). Imitation and gender insubordination. In H. Abelove, M. A. Barale & D. M. Halperin (Eds.), The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
Cagle, J., & Hornik, S. (2001). Faculty development and educational technology. T.H.E. Journal, 29(3), 92-97.
Candiotti, A., & Clarke, N. (1998). Combining universal access with faculty development and academic facilities. Communications of the ACM, 41(1), 36-41.
Castelnuovo, S., & Guthrie, S. R. (1998). Feminism and the female body: Liberating the Amazon within. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Center for Academic Transformation. (2004). Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://www.center.rpi.edu/
Chizmar, J. F., & Williams, D. B., 2001, 18-24. (2001). What do faculty want? Educause Quarterly, 24(1), 18-24.
Conti, G. J. (1989). Assessing teaching style in continuing education. In E. R. Hayes (Ed.), New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (Vol. 43, pp. 3-16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Conti, G. J. (1990). Identifying your teaching style. In M. Gailbraith (Ed.), Adult Learning Methods. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cuban, L. (1984). How Teachers Taught: Consistency and change in American classrooms, 1890-1980. New York: Longman.
Darkenwald, G. G. (1989). Enhancing the adult classroom environment. In. deMarrais, K. B., & Lapan, S. D. (Eds.). (2004). Foundations for research methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
deMarrais, K. B., & Lapan, S. D. (Eds.). (2004). Foundations for Research Methods of Inquiry in Education and the Social Sciences. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
deMarrais, K. B., & LeCompte, M. D. (1999). The way schools work: A sociological analysis of education (Third ed.). New York: Longman.
Denzin, N. K. (1986). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Dexter, S. L., Anderson, R. E., & Becker, H. J. (1999). Teachers' views of computers as catalysts for changes in their teaching practice. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(3), 221.
Donovan, M. (1999). Rethinking faculty support. Retrieved September 19, 2003, from http://ts.mivu.org/default.asp?show=article&id=612
Donovan, M., & Macklin, S. (1998). One size doesn't fit all: designing scaleable, client-centered support for technology in teaching. Paper presented at the CAUSE98: The Networked Academy, Seattle, Washington.
Duderstadt, J. J., Atkins, D. E., & Van Houweling, D. (2002). Higher education in the digital age: Technology issues and strategies for American colleges and universities. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
Dunn, R. S., & Dunn, K. J. (1979). Learning styles/teaching styles: Should they...can they...be matched? Educational Leadership, 36(4), 238.
Dusick, D. M. (1998). What social cognitive factors influence faculty members' use of computers for teaching? A literature review. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2), 123.
Ernest, P. (1989). The knowledge, beliefs and attitudes of the mathematics teacher: A model. Journal of Education for Teaching, 15, 13-34.
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.
Fanon, F. (1952). The fact of blackness (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). In Black skin, white masks. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
Felder, R. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 289-290.
Fielding, N., & Fielding, J. (1986). Linking data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Flax, J. (1990). Transitional thinking 3: Postmodernist philosophies. In Thinking fragments: Psychoanlaysis, feminism, and postmodernism in the contemporary west (pp. 28-43). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Fredman, A. (1992). Yes, I can. Action projects to resolve equity issues in educational computing. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
Galloway, J. P. (1997). How teachers use and learn to use computers. In Technology and Teacher Education Annual Journal, 1997. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Gardiner, L. F. (1998). Why we must change: The research evidence. Thought & Action(Spring).
Giroux, H. A. (1994). Doing cultural studies: Youth and the challenge of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 64(3), 278.
Grasha, A. F. (1994). A matter of style: The teacher as expert, formal authority, personal model, facilitator, and delegator. College Teaching, 42(4), 12.
Grasha, A. F. (1996). Teaching with style. Pittsburg, PA: Alliance Publishers.
Grasha, A. F., & Yangarber-Hicks, N. (2000). Integrating teaching styles and learning styles with instructional technology. College Teaching, 48(1), 2.
Groves, M. M., & Zemel, P. C. (2000). Instructional technology adoption in higher education: An action research case study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 27(1), 57.
Hagedorn, L. S. (1996). Wage equity and female job satisfaction: The role of wage differentials in a job satisfaction cause model. Research on Higher Education, 37(5), 569-598.
Hagner, P. R. (2000). Faculty engagement and support in the new learning environment. Educause Review, 35(5), 27-37.
Hallam, M. (2000). WebCT tools and the good teaching principles they support. Retrieved November 27, 2004, from http://www.webct.com/WYW/ViewContent?contentID=2627458&pageName=WebCT3_tools.html
Harding, S. (1987). Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (Ed.), Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Henwood, F. (2000). From the woman question in technology to the technology question in feminism: rethinking gender equality in IT education. The European Journal of Women's Studies, 7, 209-227.
Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought. London: Routledge.
Hirschbuhl, J. J., & Faseyitan, S. O. (1994). Faculty uses of computers: Fears, facts and perceptions. T H E Journal, 21(9), 64.
Hogarty, K. Y., Lang, T. R., & Kromrey, J. D. (2003). Another look at technology use in the classrooms: The development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers' perceptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(1), 139-162.
Holloway, R. E. (1998). Diffusion and adoption of educational technology: A critique of research design. In D. J. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Educational Technology (pp. 1107-1133): Macmillian.
Holt-Reynolds, D. (1992). Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in coursework. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 325-349.
Honey, M., & Moeller, B. (1990). Teacher's beliefs and technology integration: Different values, different understandings. CTE Technical Report Issue No. 6.
Hoyt, D. P., & Lee, E. J. (2002). Teaching "styles" and learning outcomes. IDEA Research Report.
Inkpen, K., Upitis, R., Klawe, M., Lawry, J., Anderson, A., Ndunda, M., et al. (1994). We have never forgetful flowers in our garden: Girls' responses to electronic games. Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching, 13(4), 383-403.
Jick, T. (1983). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative Methodology (pp. 135-148). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65.
Kaminski, K. (2000). Infusing technology into the classroom. TechTrend, 44(3), 38-39.
Kaplan, E. J., & Kies, D. A. (1995). Teaching styles and learning styles: Which came first? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 22(1), 29.
Knupfer, N. N. (1998). Gender divisions across technology advertisements and the WWW: Implications for educational equity. Theory Into Practice, 37(1), 54.
Lage, E. (1991). Boys, Girls, and microcomputing. European Journal of Psychology in Education, 6(1), 29-44.
Littlejohn, A., & Sclater, N. (1999). The virtual university as a conceptual model for faculty change and innovation. Interactive Learning Environments, 7(2-3), 209-225.
Lucas., S. B. (2002). The individualization of education: WebCT and learning styles in language instruction. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 34(1), 77-81.
Lucas, S. B., & Smith, G. (2004, April). Exploration of instructional technology in higher education: The role of gender in IT teaching practices and beliefs among faculty. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, California.
Lumpe, A. T., & Chambers, E. (2001). Assessing teachers' context beliefs about technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 93-107.
Lyons, R. E., Kysilka, M. L., & Pawlas, G. E. (1999). The adjunct professor's guide to success: Surviving and thriving in the college classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Mehra, B. (2002). Bias in qualitative research: Voices from an online classroom. Retrieved July 1, 2004, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-1/mehra.html
Meltzer, J., & Sherman, T. M. (1997). Ten commandments for successful technology implementation and staff development. NASSP Bulletin, 81(585), 23-32.
Meltzoff, J. (1999). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Millis, B. J. (1994). Faculty development in the 1990s: what it is and why we can't wait. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72(5), 454-465.
Morahan-Martin, J. (1998). Males, females and the internet. In J. Gackenback (Ed.), Psychology and the internet: imtrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal applications (pp. 169-197). San Diego: Academic Press.
NCREL. (1995). Glossary of education terms and acronyms. Retrieved February, 29, 2004, from http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/misc/glossary.htm
Neal, E. (1998). Using technology in teaching: We need to exercise healthy skepticism. Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. B4-5.
O'Connor, T. (1997). Using learning styles to adapt technology for higher education. Retrieved November 27, 2004, from http://www.indstate.edu/ctl/ styles/learning.html
Oblinger, D. G. (2004). Educating the net generation. Paper presented at the Educause, Denver, CO.
Overholtzer, J. (2001). A support crisis of our own making? Training versus equipping. Educause Quartely, 24(4), 35-40.
Padgett, D., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). Designing a faculty development program on technology: If you build it, they will come. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2).
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: Why shouldn't women's work count? The Journal of Higher Education, 67(1), 46-84.
Parker, D. (1997). Increasing faculty use of technology in teaching and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2/3), 105-115.
Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers' beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 51(2).
Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 36, 355-396.
Rist, R. C. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: the self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review(40), 411-451.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
Rossman, G.B. & Wilson, B.C. (1985) Numbers and words: combining qualitative and quantitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627-643.
Rutherford, L. H., & Grana, S. J. (1995). Retrofitting academe: Adapting faculty attitudes and practices to technology. Retrieved September 11, 2002, from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/articleprintversion.cfm?aid=1274
Sadker, M. P., & Sadker, D. M. (1985). Sexism in the schoolroom of the '80s. Psychology Today, 54-57.
Schneider, A. (1998). Why don't women publish as much as men? The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45, A14.
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(1), 95-110.
Schutz, P. A., Chambless, C. B., & DeCuir, J. T. (2004). Multimethods research. In K. B. deMarrais & S. D. Lapan (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences: Frameworks for knowing and doing. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Shapiro, W. L., & Cartwright, G. P. (1998). New ways to link technology and faculty development. Change, 30(5), 50-52.
Scheurich, J. J. (1994). Social relativism: A postmodernist epistemology for educational administration. In S. J. Maxcy (Ed.), Postmodern school leadership: Meeting the crisis in educational administration (pp. 17-46). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Skeele, R., & Daly, J. (1997). Technology, pedagogy, and academic freedom: a democratic paradigm for the 21st century. Technology and Teacher Education Annual, 49-52.
Skiba, R. J., Michael, R. S., Nardo, A. C., & Peterson, R. (2000). The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality in School Punishment: Indiana Education Policy Center.
Sorg, S., Truman-Davis, B., Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., Hartman, J., & Juge, F. (1999). Faculty development, learner support and evaluation in web-based programs. Interactive Learning Environments, 7(2-3), 137-153.
Spotts, T. H., Bowman, M. A., & Mertz, C. (1997). Gender and use of instructional technologies: A study of university faculty. Higher Education, 34(4), 421.
Stecklein, J. E., & Lorenz, G. E. (1986). Academic women: Twenty-four years of progress? Liberal Education, 72(1), 63-71.
Teaching Philosophies: Teacher and Student Centered Approaches. (2004). Retrieved February 29, 2004, from http://trc.ucdavis.edu/trc/ta/tatips/philosophies1.pdf
Thurston, C. O., Stuve, M. J., Pianfetti, E. S., & Thomas, R. (1998). Multiple means of support: the role of the office of educational technology in faculty development. In Technology and Teacher Education Annual (pp. 352-355).
Van Dusen, G. C. (1998, Spring). Technology: Higher education's magic bullet. Thought & Action.
Watkins, B. T. (1990). Growing number of older students stirs professors to alter teaching styles. Chronicle of Higher Education, 36(46), A1.
Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Wetzel, K. (1993). Teacher educators' uses of computers in teaching. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 1(4), 335-352.
White, J. T., & Myers, S. D. (2001). You can teach an old dog new tricks: The faculty's role in technology. Business Communication Quarterly, 64(3).
Wilson, C. (2001). Faculty attitudes about distance education. Educause Quartely, 2.
Women's Learning Partnership for Rights, Development, and Peace. (2003). Retrieved March 17, 2004, from http://www.learningpartnership.org/facts/tech.phtml
Woods, P. (1993). Managing marginality: Teacher development through grounded life history. British Educational Research Journal, 19(5), 447.
Young, B. J. (2000). Gender differences in student attitudes toward computers. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 204.
Zhao, Y., & Cziko, G. A. (2001). Teacher adoption of technology: A perceptual control theory perspective. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1).
Zinn, L. M. (1990). Identifying your philosophical orientation. In M. W. Galbraith (Ed.), Adult learning methods (pp. 39-78). Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
Zvacek, S. M. (2001). Confessions of a guerilla technologist. Educause Quartely, 24(2), 40-45.